Archive for February, 2007

27
Feb

Tripwire 2007 Coming!

The following is the invitation of Tripwire 2007,

Tripwire was on fire during 2006 and thanks to our valued partners, we had a tremendous year. We cordially invite you to join us via WebEx for a briefing with Rob Warmack, Tripwire’s Vice President of Product Marketing and Communications, for Tripwire 2007 - Taking us Higher!Topic: Tripwire 2007Date: Wednesday, February 28, 2007Time: 5:00 pm , Pacific Standard Time (GMT -08:00, San Jose) 12:00 Noon Sydney, 9:00 am Hong Kong & SingaporeTo attend this web seminar, you must first register for it. Once you have registered, you will receive an email message confirming your enrollment status and information that you need to join the event.

Click the following link to see more information about the event and to register:https://tripwire.webex.com/tripwire/onstage/g.php?d=441792254&t=a
Best Regards,
Team Tripwire

13
Feb

Technology Vendor Glance

BSM/ITSM
IBM Tivoli / Netcool (Micromuse) / Maximo (MRO)
HP / Mercury Interactive
CA
EMC/SMARTS / nLayers
Managed Objects
PerformanceIT
Proactive Net
BMC
Magnum
Indicative
ProcessWorx
Axios Systems
Proxima Technology(acquired by Compuware)
Netuitive

BAM
Systar
Celequest (acquired by Cognos)
Digital Fuel

BPM / BPM 2.0
Intalio
Pega
Dashboards
iDashboards
Mirror42
Corda
Dundas

Transaction Assurance/Monitoring
OpTier

Service Desk
BMC/Remedy
Axio
FrontRange
MRO Software (acquired by IBM Tivoli)

Change / Configuration Governance
Serena
Cirba
Tideway
Voyance
Alterpoint
Opsware
Cendura Acquired by CA - 9/2006
Troux
Solidcore

Service Catalog
NewScale
Centrata

IT Process Automation (ITPA)
RealOps
Opalis
Cassatt
IConclude
Uplogix
NetworkAutomation

Analytics / Datawarehouse / BI
Netezza

Logfile Processing, Storage, Analytics, Monitoring
LogLogic
Log Rhythm

Wireless Service Assurance
Vallent(acquired by IBM Tivoli)
Mycom
Aircom

Integration, Instrumentation, Data Sharing
RSSBus

Open Source Software
ZenOSS

Software as a Service (SaaS)
Klir

NSM/ESM
Heroix

11
Feb

Controlling Change with Tripwire Enterprise 6.0

Different IT organizations have different approaches to controlling change across their IT infrastructure. Through enhanced detecting reconciling and reporting, Tripwire 6.0 enables change control regardless of the approach to change management. Tripwire Enterprise delivers immediate value and ensures that:

  • All change is VISIBLE
  • All change is PLANNED
  • Actual changes are VERIFIED
  • Change Management is INTEGRATED

All Change is VISIBLE:
Tripwire Enterprise 6.0 expands its breadth to ensure all change across the IT infrastructure is VISIBLE. Tripwire delivers immediate value for customers whose approach to change management is to informally define and enforce change policies, Tripwire…

  • Captures independent detailed audit trails of all changes
  • Maintains baselines to ensure trusted system states
  • Compares similar systems to ensure configuration consistency
  • Provides metrics on change activity

Customers benefit by…

  1. Faster recovery from outages by pinpointing exactly what changed
  2. Ensuring accountability and eliminating the “deniability factor”
  3. A foundation for building stronger controls

All Change is PLANNED:
Tripwire Enterprise 6.0 introduces automated reconciliation policies that use multiple acceptance criteria and conditional change actions to ensure that all change is PLANNED. Tripwire delivers immediate value
for those customers whose approach is to authorize change based on who made the change and/or when the change was made (e.g. authorized person during a change window).

In addition to providing VISIBILITY, Tripwire…

  • Discovers changes by unauthorized users
  • Discovers changes made outside of maintenance windows
  • Alerts management to change policy exceptions

Customers benefit by…

  • Reduced outages and costs caused by unplanned change
  • Ability to quickly detect and respond to process circumventions
  • Increased change process diligence with minimal disrupption to operations

Actual Changes are VERIFIED:
Tripwire Enterprise 6.0’s automated reconciliation also includes categorization of changes, systems and change types with custom properties and change actions to ensure that actual changes are VERIFIED. Tripwire delivers immediate value for those customers whose approach is to document, test and approve changes before they are applied. Once authorized changes are verified using conditional change actions, Tripwire automatically sets custom properties to identify why those changes were authorized (i.e.
approved change ticket). Unauthorized changes discovered are then reported to IT management.

Tripwire ensures change is VISIBLE and PLANNED, plus…

  • Discovers changes that don’t match expected results
  • Discovers changes that aren’t associated to change tickets
  • Provides management with actionable change activity information

Customers benefit by…

  • Significantly reduced unplanned work and its associated impacts
  • Fewer outages and faster recovery times
  • Greater predictability in delivering new and reliable services

Change Control is INTEGRATED:
Tripwire Enterprise 6.0 enhances the SOAP API and the Command Line Interface to ensure that change management is INTEGRATED. Tripwire delivers immediate value for those customers whose approach
to change management is to leverage ITSM tools (change, configuration, release management)

Tripwire ensures change is VISIBLE, PLANNED and VERIFIED, plus…

  • Automatically reconciles changes with data from other ITSM tools
  • Automatically triggers investigation of unauthorized changes

Customers benefit by…

  • Enabling an automated, closed-loop change management system
  • Sustained compliance and IT governance
  • Continuous improvement
10
Feb

About the CMF market

resoure from Gartner RAS Core Research Note G00137641

Content monitoring and filtering products helporganizations address the problem ofsensitive data crossing the enterprise networkboundary over multiple channels and protocols.New vendors will enter the market, and existingvendors will consolidate or be acquired byestablished security vendors.
Content monitoring and filtering (CMF) is a relativelynew market for detecting and preventing informationleaks. While still adolescent, tools provide immediatevalue in protecting corporate intellectual assets andcustomer privacy. Customers can feel confident thatexisting tools, even from small vendors, do limitinformation loss; however, customers should expectsignificant market turmoil during the next twoyears as new vendors continue to enter themarket and existing vendors consolidate orare acquired by established security vendors.

Market Overview
CMF is an adolescent market, and a smallone, grossing $20 million to $25 million in2005. The market is forecast to grow to $40million to $60 million in 2006 because ofincreased customer demand. The market hasbeen around since 2001, but most vendorsare less than 2 years old. We expectsignificant activity during the next few years assome vendors shut down, are acquired or joinwith others. At least one large security vendorwill acquire a CMF pure-play vendor by yearend2006 (0.8 probability). CMF features arefound in other products, such as e-mailsecurity solutions, instant messaging, orendpoint monitoring solutions that are notstand-alone CMF products.Pure-play network CMF tools are the best andmost-comprehensive solutions for detectinginformation loss because they cover managedand unmanaged systems across the widestrange of network protocols. These productscan monitor multiple channels for specific inboundand outbound content based on rules or signatures.Host-based offerings are more difficult to manage,have much more primitive detection techniques andfail to protect unmanaged systems. Increasingly,single-channel filters, dedicated to just e-mail orinstant messaging (IM), are expanding into themultiple-channel market through partnership andacquisition, but they still usually lack the broadnessof coverage and centralized management andreporting of a pure-play network CMF product.Companies that offer host solutions include OakleyNetworks, Verdasys and Orchestria (which has acombined host-network model but was excluded fromthis Magic Quadrant because the host is mandatory).Single-channel vendors include IMlogic (acquired bychallengers leadersniche players visionariescompleteness of visionability to executeAs of October 2005VontuTablusVericeptProofpointPortAuthority TechnologiesReconnexIntrusion Fidelis Security SystemsPalisadeSystemsSource: GartnerMAGIC QUADRANTFigure 1. Magic Quadrant for Content Monitoring andFiltering, 20062The Magic Quadrant is copyrighted October 2005 by Gartner, Inc. and is reused with permission. The Magic Quadrant is a graphicalrepresentation of a marketplace at and for a specific time period. It depicts Gartner’s analysis of how certain vendors measure againstcriteria for that marketplace, as defined by Gartner. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in the MagicQuadrant, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors placed in the “Leaders” quadrant. The Magic Quadrantis intended solely as a research tool, and is not meant to be a specific guide to action. Gartner disclaims all warranties, express orimplied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.© 2006 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permissionis forbidden. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warrantiesas to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Gartner shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequaciesin the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection ofthese materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.Symantec), Akonix Systems (IM), FaceTimeCommunications (IM/P2P [peer to peer]), CipherTrust(e-mail, moving into the CMF market this year),IronPort Systems (e-mail), TumbleweedCommunications (e-mail), and Clearswift (separatee-mail and HTTP products).

The CMF market is following a predictable evolutionthat consists of four stages:
1. Monitoring e-mail using basic keyword matchingor regular expressions
2. Monitoring multiple channels – typically IM, FTP,HTTP or generic TCP/IP – using more-advanceddetection techniques (the present state of themarket). Early filtering appears, typically first for email,then HTTP and then other protocols.
3. Analysis of static, stored sensitive data –Integration with document management systems,and basic endpoint agents without true contentanalysiscapabilities.
4. Successful blocking of all channels on the networkand hosts from which data can be stolen. Thiswould include host-based agents that can stopsomeone from downloading sensitive data – forexample, through a Universal Serial Bus (USB)drive – and printing it and walking out the door.
Steps 1 and 2 involve devices that sit at the edge ofthe network, while Step 3 includes deeper integrationwith internal traffic. Step 4, where this technology isheaded, involves agents that can sit on a local hostand allow, for example, a file with personal photos tobe transferred to a USB, but not a customer list. Step4 also includes much-deeper integration with internalinfrastructure, applications and servers for moremonitoring of internal traffic. However, the industry isstill some distance from that goal. Host-basedintegration with CMF will increase in 2006, with muchbroader deployment and capabilities in 2007, buthost-only solutions are not expected to succeed asCMF tools because of enterprise restrictions on thenumber of desktop tools and weak content-analysiscapabilities.

Market Definition/Description
Gartner defines CMF products as those that, as acore function, perform deep packet inspection oninbound and outbound network communicationstraffic, track sessions, and perform linguistic analysisto detect and/or block specific content based on rulesor policies. CMF products must monitor, at aminimum, e-mail traffic and at least one otherchannel, such as IM, FTP or HTTP. Linguisticanalysis must involve more than keyword matching(for example, the product must use advanced regularexpressions, perform document fingerprinting orBayesian analysis, or be capable of machinelearning). CMF depends on linguistic or statisticalanalysis, or other pattern matching techniques, toidentify content, track activity and potentially stop thecontent/transmission from being moved.

Many security managers believe that the value ofCMF lies in protecting intellectual property and othervaluable enterprise data, especially nonpublic privateinformation, from theft. However, we feel this is reallya secondary consideration: The true value of CMFlies in helping management to identify and correctfaulty business processes and accidental disclosures.In other words, CMF is better at helping you toidentify bad practices that put your data at risk, rather3than preventing malicious individuals from stealingyour data. Product features should be evaluated withthis in mind. Within two years, the technology willevolve to deal more directly with the problem ofmalicious attacks. At its present state ofdevelopment, CMF will stop only the most basic ofmalicious activities, but better attack protection isexpected by year-end 2007.

Completeness of Vision
The first CMF products appeared five years ago, butthe market rapidly entered the mainstream during thepast two years, and Gartner estimates overall marketrevenue grew more in 2005 than in all prior yearscombined. As a highly competitive new market,preference is given to vendors with the strongestproduct strategy, deepest market understanding, andbest ability to innovate and differentiate. Vendorswith the most complete product vision, anddemonstrated ability to follow that vision, rate moreSource: GartnerEvaluation Criteria WeightingProduct/Service highOverall Viability (Business Unit,Financial, Strategy, Organization) highSales Execution/Pricing lowMarket Responsiveness andTrack Record standardMarketing Execution standardCustomer Experience highOperations standardTable 1. Ability to Execute EvaluationCriteriahighly than those distracted by niche markets,“chasing the hype,” or a flawed vision. While Ability toExecute is weighted toward current product features,Completeness of Vision is weighted toward productstrategy for the future, market understanding, and avendor’s track record of innovation. Because Gartnerexpects more-established security vendors to enterand dominate the market through acquisition, moreemphasis is placed on the products rather than themarketing, sales or vertical strategies.Product vision should show a strong understandingof the business problem driving CMF – the protectionof corporate intellectual assets and nonpublicinformation. Emphasis should be placed on detectingand preventing information loss across all enterpriseassets, not just solving a specific technical problemor performing traditional network forensics.

Leaders
The CMF Magic Quadrant is new and has only oneentry in the Leaders quadrant – Vontu – and itsranking is based primarily on scalability andexecution in the marketplace. Vontu offers one of themost comprehensive feature sets and rates well inperformance, manageability and accuracy accordingto vendor-provided and independent references. Butthis is a maturing space, and the expectations forleaders will rise as more enterprises implement thesetools. Customers will be looking for more leaders with5enterprise scalability, channel coverage and blockingacross all channels. Expect more vendors to reachthe Leaders quadrant by supporting enhancedworkflow, encryption, discovery and host-basedcapabilities. To maintain the leader’s position, Vontuwill need to continue a high pace of innovation,significantly expand sales, and grow its sales andtechnical partnerships. Some features offeredthrough technical partnership will need to beincorporated into the base product to simplifydeployments and pricing. Many competitors havereleased or announced competitive features sincethe evaluation cutoff date of 1 November, and weexpect more offerings to join Vontu in the Leadersspace during the next update of this Magic Quadrant.

Challengers
Proofpoint is the only challenger. Proofpoint’s abilityto execute is enhanced by its experience in thesecure e-mail boundary (SEB) market and overlap inthe CMF segment with its core technology. Weexpect more challengers from the SEB market toappear during the next year as the CMF marketgrows. Challengers from the SEB area will need toenhance their multiprotocol offerings to becompetitive. Proofpoint’s vision is inhibited somewhatby its e-mail roots. It leads other SEB vendorswanting to enter the market but offers little innovationor leadership to the CMF market itself.

10
Feb

Virtualization creates the potential for more secure servers in a hosted environment, but it might all be an illusion

There’s a good argument to make, and some experts make it, that virtualization is one of those technologies that’s making a cyclical comeback. The whole VM thing, after all, was invented by IBM guys in the ’60s, right?

My instincts are sympathetic to this argument: VMs were invented for an era when hardware was really, really expensive, and it made sense to make maximum utilization of it. But hardware is dirt cheap these days, and having n smaller physical boxes rather than one BHS (Big Honking Server) emulating n brings a certain amount of robustness through redundancy. I could argue it both ways, especially when it comes to manageability.

But security is one area where virtualization creates interesting new potential, at least in the short term. It has already created new services for some providers to sell, largely centered around security considerations.

I speak of hosted servers, which generally are Web servers. There have always been two very general categories of hosted servers: shared and dedicated (yeah, it’s more complicated than that, but I think I’m covering the big picture). Shared servers are cheap, as little as a few dollars a month. A hosting service can run thousands of Web sites on a single Apache/Linux box and certainly hundreds of them on a Windows Server 2003 system.

These shared servers are not virtualized; they are running one Web server program that handles many Web sites. The server software is designed to isolate the Web sites and the applications that run on them from each other, but it’s far from a perfect system.

Compromise the server and you’ve very likely compromised all of the Web sites on it.

10
Feb

well, here is the hill of Justin

Today, I am very happy to have he account on Blogger.com, It’s a milestone for me, to have a hill of my ideas, insight and thinkings, to share the insight on the biz in China software area and relevant things interesting for the guys in the same camp.
Additionally, thanks Shirley, without her, I couldn’t have enough time to leave the words here.